A workflow that should not exist cannot be fixed by automating it faster. The first question is whether the work needs doing at all; whether a process redesign would halve it and only then whether a piece of software should take over. A lot of the best consulting hours are spent deleting things, not building them.
A small firm with a long bench.
Consilix is founder-led. Small projects are delivered directly; larger ones are delivered by a specialist team assembled from a curated network of freelance engineers, designers and consultants. The sales call, the strategy and the accountability stay with the founder. The rest scales with the scope of the engagement.
James Wood.
I spent five years inside early-stage startups before starting Consilix. In each one I ended up building the AI systems myself, not because anyone asked me to but because the off-the-shelf tools stopped halfway and someone had to finish the job. That pattern is the thesis of this firm.
I formally grounded the technical side by completing a software development programme after the commercial years, which means I sit at an unusual intersection: I can hold a full P&L conversation with a managing partner, then go and write the code for the thing we just agreed to build. Most AI vendors can do one of those things; very few can do both without a handoff.
Over those years I have built a trusted network of freelance specialists: senior engineers, data people, designers and domain consultants. For small engagements, I deliver directly. For larger ones, I assemble the right team, run the engagement and remain the single point of accountability from first call to handover.
Four lines we actually operate by.
A prototype that demos brilliantly and nobody uses is worth nothing. A rougher build that actually removes two hours from a Tuesday afternoon is worth a great deal. The bar for "done" is not whether it looks clever in a screenshare; it is whether the team doing the work prefers it to what they were doing before.
The interesting problems are not solved by a better prompt or a bigger model. They are solved by connecting existing tools, existing data and existing people in ways that compound. Most Consilix builds are less about AI in isolation and more about plumbing, with the AI picking up the parts that plumbing cannot.
Consilix is deliberately not a SaaS company. There is no platform to renew. There is no seat-based pricing pushing us to find users who do not need the thing. Every client relationship is an engagement that can be ended at a month's notice and the builds are yours the moment they ship.
What working with Consilix actually feels like, in practice.
Audit, not onboarding.
No month-long ramp. The first on-site day is already observing real work. You see value from Stage 01 before you sign anything larger.
Founder-led, specialist-backed.
Small projects are delivered directly. Larger ones are delivered by a team assembled from a curated network of freelance engineers, designers and domain specialists, briefed and run by James end to end.
Fixed fees, scoped per engagement.
The audit is a fixed fee scoped to your team size. Every build is a fixed fee, scoped from the audit, with a one-page SOW. The monthly retainer is rolling. No day-rate creep, no change-order gamesmanship.
The builds are yours.
Every build Consilix ships belongs to the client, including the prompts, the code and the documentation. You can replace us with someone cheaper the day after handover. That constraint keeps us honest about making builds maintainable.
On-site where it matters.
The audit runs on-site because watching the work is how you learn what the work is. Build sprints are mostly remote. The monthly retainer is flexible: whatever cadence the engagement needs.
Your tools, your tenancy.
We default to tools you already hold data-processing agreements with. Custom infrastructure goes in a UK region with a signed DPA. No fishing expeditions through client data.
The engagements we turn down.
Consilix is small enough that every engagement needs to be the right shape. A handful of categories are rarely a good fit.
- Firms where AI is the product itself. If you are building an AI platform for resale, you need an ML team and an infrastructure shop, not a fractional AI consultancy. There are better firms for this and we can recommend them.
- Anyone looking for the cheapest quote. Pricing is fixed and transparent. It is not the lowest number in the market. If price is the primary filter, the right partner is an offshore dev shop or a no-code template, not Consilix.
- Projects without a real sponsor. If the senior sponsor does not have authority to sign off on changes that cross departments, the audit will surface things the organisation cannot act on. Better to wait until that sponsor exists.
- Engagements where nothing is allowed to ship. We are happy to produce a strategy, a deck, or a board paper where the engagement needs one; what we will not do is take on work where the deliverable is a document and the building is explicitly off the table. The audit exists to drive action, not to sit on a shelf.
- "Can you just…" requests without a workflow behind them. Builds attached to a specific workflow pay for themselves. Builds attached to an executive's passing curiosity usually do not. The audit is the filter.
Thirty minutes. No deck. Bring one question.
Book a call and we will walk through it with you. You leave knowing whether it is worth doing, what it would cost and whether Consilix is the right partner for it.
Book a call